Deutsche Tageszeitung - Far-right AfD could be next after German court defunds neo-Nazi party

Far-right AfD could be next after German court defunds neo-Nazi party


Far-right AfD could be next after German court defunds neo-Nazi party
Far-right AfD could be next after German court defunds neo-Nazi party / Photo: © POOL/AFP

Germany's constitutional court on Tuesday approved a request to withdraw public funds from the neo-Nazi Homeland party, offering what one official called a possible "blueprint" for action against the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD).

Change text size:

Homeland, known until 2023 as the NPD, was "excluded from state funding for a period of six years", the court said.

Markus Soeder, the conservative premier of the southern region of Bavaria, said ahead of the ruling that withdrawing funds from Homeland could be a "blueprint for the AfD" -- an idea which has its supporters across the political spectrum.

In its reasoning, the court said Homeland sought to "eliminate the free democratic order" and had a "racist, in particular anti-Muslim, anti-Semitic and anti-Gypsy, attitude" that clashed with Germany's constitutional principles.

The neo-Nazi group would therefore lose access to state funding available to parties, as well as any tax breaks.

"The forces that want to dismantle and destroy our democracy must not receive a cent of government funding," Interior Minister Nancy Faeser said.

The court verdict comes amid debate in Germany over how to counter the popularity of the far-right AfD, which is under close surveillance by domestic intelligence after being classed a "suspected case of far-right extremism".

The AfD currently sits second in national polls, and is leading them in several eastern regions where elections are set to be held later this year.

- 'Confirmed' extremist -

The party's rise has tapped into concerns over rising migration, high inflation and a stumbling economy.

The prospect that the AfD is closer to holding high political office than ever before has added urgency to the debate over how to respond.

Below the national party, three regional branches of the AfD -- in the eastern states of Saxony, Saxony-Anhalt and Thuringia -- are classed as "confirmed" extremist organisations for their efforts to undermine democracy and their anti-immigrant rhetoric.

Over the weekend, hundreds of thousands of people came out to protest against the AfD after its members were revealed to have discussed a mass deportation plan at a meeting with extremists.

"This ruling comes at a time which shows again that right-wing extremism is the greatest extremist threat to our democracy -- and to people in our country," Faeser said.

The mooted mass deportation plan was "an attack on the foundations of our society", Faeser said.

Germany's democratic institutions would make use of the "instruments" available to them, she said.

Some government figures have urged caution, however, and warned against giving the AfD material for an anti-establishment campaign.

- Failed ban -

The challenge to the AfD needed to be "political", while any action should be limited to the "constitutionally necessary and possible", Finance Minister Christian Lindner told broadcaster Welt TV.

The parties of the "democratic centre" should not give the impression they "want to use party law to fend off unwanted competition", Lindner said.

The request to exclude Homeland from state financing was made by the German government, together with the upper and lower houses of the German parliament in 2019.

A previous attempt to ban the party outright in 2017 failed, when the constitutional court in Karlsruhe said the then NPD was not a real enough threat to be prohibited.

The German constitution was subsequently changed to introduce the possibility of withdrawing state funds.

Public money flows to any party in Germany which scores at least 0.5 percent in national or European elections, or one percent in regional votes.

Homeland, which as the NPD was for a long time a small but significant minority party, has seen its following dwindle and has dropped below the support threshold to be eligible for public funds.

But the party has still benefitted from tax advantages available to political parties, such as exemptions for donations.

(W.Budayev--DTZ)

Featured

Zelensky says Trump waiving sanctions 'rewards' Putin, warns Moscow wants 'blackout' in Ukraine

Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky said Saturday that US President Donald Trump's decision to block Russia sanctions only "rewards" Russia's Vladimir Putin and warned Moscow was trying to deprive "millions" of Ukrainians of heat and electricity before winter.

Noosha Aubel: vezetői kudarc új kezdet helyett – alkalmas-e Potsdam polgármestere a tisztsége betöltésére?

Noosha Aubel (50 éves, pártonkívüli) új kezdetet ígért Potsdamnak, miután a város polgárai eltávolították hivatalából elődjét, Mike Schubertet (53 éves, SPD – Németország Szociáldemokrata Pártja). Csaknem egy évvel Aubel hivatalba lépése után azonban ezekkel az ígéretekkel egy halmozottan, súlyosan fogyatékos kisgyermek ellátása körül kialakult botrány, leromlott állapotú utak, költségvetési zárolás és egy elmérgesedett vezetési válság áll szemben. A gyermek ellátásának ügye időközben Brandenburg tartomány fővárosa, Potsdam, különösen pedig Noosha Aubel erkölcsi bizonyítványává vált. Mindeközben tisztségéhez kiemelkedő javadalmazás társul: Aubel jelenleg évi 143 056 euró alapilletményt vesz fel. Egy bejelentett illetményemelés után ez az összeg a jövőben évi 169 006,44 euróra nőne, amelyet a polgároknak kell finanszírozniuk.Mindez felvet egy kellemetlen, ám jogos kérdést: képes-e Noosha Aubel egyáltalán megfelelni egy tartományi főváros gazdasági, szervezési és politikai követelményeinek?

نوشا آوبل: ناکامی در مدیریت به‌جای آغازی نو؛ آیا شهردار پوتسدام از عهدهٔ مسئولیت‌هایش برمی‌آید؟

نوشا آوبل، ۵۰ ساله و بدون وابستگی حزبی، پس از آنکه شهروندان پوتسدام سلف او، مایک شوبرت، ۵۳ ساله و عضو حزب سوسیال‌دموکرات آلمان (SPD)، را از سمتش برکنار کردند، به این شهر وعدهٔ آغازی نو داد. اکنون، نزدیک به یک سال پس از آغاز کار آوبل، آن وعده با واقعیتی متفاوت روبه‌روست: رسوایی در تأمین خدمات مراقبتی برای کودکی خردسال با چندین معلولیت بسیار شدید که به گواهی بر ورشکستگی اخلاقی پوتسدام، مرکز ایالت براندنبورگ، و به‌ویژه خود نوشا آوبل تبدیل شده است؛ خیابان‌هایی فرسوده، توقف هزینه‌کرد بودجه و بحرانی فزاینده در مدیریت شهر. در همین حال، سمت او از حقوقی بسیار بالا برخوردار است: آوبل در حال حاضر سالانه ۱۴۳٬۰۵۶ یورو حقوق پایه دریافت می‌کند. طبق افزایش حقوق اعلام‌شده، قرار است این مبلغ در آینده حتی به ۱۶۹٬۰۰۶٫۴۴ یورو در سال برسد؛ هزینه‌ای که شهروندان باید تأمین کنند.   ازاین‌رو، پرسشی ناخوشایند اما بجا مطرح می‌شود: آیا نوشا آوبل اساساً از نظر اقتصادی، سازمانی و سیاسی توان پاسخ‌گویی به الزامات ادارهٔ مرکز یک ایالت را دارد؟

Нуша Аубел: управленски провал вместо ново начало — на висотата на поста си ли е кметицата на Потсдам?

Нуша Аубел (50 г., безпартийна) обеща на Потсдам ново начало, след като гражданите отстраниха от длъжност нейния предшественик Майк Шуберт (53 г., ГСДП — Германска социалдемократическа партия). Почти година след встъпването ѝ в длъжност срещу това обещание стоят скандалът около грижите за малко дете с множество тежки увреждания, превърнал се в свидетелство за моралната несъстоятелност на провинциалната столица Потсдам и особено на самата Нуша Аубел, разбитите улици, замразените бюджетни разходи и разрасналата се управленска криза. Същевременно постът ѝ е изключително добре платен: в момента Аубел получава основна годишна заплата от 143 056 евро. След обявеното увеличение на възнагражденията се предвижда тя да достигне дори 169 006,44 евро годишно — средства, които гражданите ще трябва да осигуряват.Това поставя един неудобен, но основателен въпрос: способна ли е изобщо Нуша Аубел да отговори на икономическите, организационните и политическите изисквания към управлението на една провинциална столица?

Change text size: