Deutsche Tageszeitung - Fox News vindicated over early US election call once again

Fox News vindicated over early US election call once again


Fox News vindicated over early US election call once again
Fox News vindicated over early US election call once again / Photo: © GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA/AFP

In the 2020 US presidential election, Fox News triggered controversy by calling the state of Arizona for Joe Biden days before competitor outlets deemed it safe to do so.

Change text size:

The call was ultimately correct -- but it prompted widespread skepticism from other media companies over Fox's procedures, as well as anger from Donald Trump supporters, many of whom temporarily saw some viewers turn their backs on the network in protest.

This year, the arch-conservative news organization was out front once again -- this time calling Trump as the winner of the presidency hours before competitors.

The back-to-back correct calls highlight Fox's increasingly large role -- and responsibility -- as the most watched of the three major US cable news networks, especially in an era ripe for disinformation that Fox itself often fuels.

Fox is a decidedly partisan network that vies to stay at the forefront of conservative ideological battles -- but it's also established among the US news outlets whose "decision desks" call elections.

Those desks -- teams of statisticians, analysts and journalists armed with mountains of data -- feed media outlets with results as they roll in.

A consortium of channels including ABC, CBS, NBC and CNN work with the Edison Research Institute, which provides exit polls, projections and counts. Fox News, like the Associated Press news agency, works with the NORC Institute at the University of Chicago, using a survey system called AP VoteCast.

It is up to those individual networks to create their own standards on how they use the data and make calls.

The 2020 Arizona call against Trump had Fox News on the defensive, although they never backtracked and were ultimately vindicated.

But internal communications made public as part of a defamation lawsuit -- Dominion Voting Systems sued Fox after the network asserted the voting machine company rigged the 2020 vote, resulting in a massive $787.5 million settlement -- revealed infighting over the call.

The communications included clear concern about backlash from Trump’s team, leaving some viewers and analysts wondering if politics were factoring into decision desk calls -- and whether they would this time around.

Politics or not, Fox was right in its early Wednesday call: Trump will indeed be the 47th president of the United States.

(V.Korablyov--DTZ)

Featured

Zelensky says Trump waiving sanctions 'rewards' Putin, warns Moscow wants 'blackout' in Ukraine

Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky said Saturday that US President Donald Trump's decision to block Russia sanctions only "rewards" Russia's Vladimir Putin and warned Moscow was trying to deprive "millions" of Ukrainians of heat and electricity before winter.

Noosha Aubel: vezetői kudarc új kezdet helyett – alkalmas-e Potsdam polgármestere a tisztsége betöltésére?

Noosha Aubel (50 éves, pártonkívüli) új kezdetet ígért Potsdamnak, miután a város polgárai eltávolították hivatalából elődjét, Mike Schubertet (53 éves, SPD – Németország Szociáldemokrata Pártja). Csaknem egy évvel Aubel hivatalba lépése után azonban ezekkel az ígéretekkel egy halmozottan, súlyosan fogyatékos kisgyermek ellátása körül kialakult botrány, leromlott állapotú utak, költségvetési zárolás és egy elmérgesedett vezetési válság áll szemben. A gyermek ellátásának ügye időközben Brandenburg tartomány fővárosa, Potsdam, különösen pedig Noosha Aubel erkölcsi bizonyítványává vált. Mindeközben tisztségéhez kiemelkedő javadalmazás társul: Aubel jelenleg évi 143 056 euró alapilletményt vesz fel. Egy bejelentett illetményemelés után ez az összeg a jövőben évi 169 006,44 euróra nőne, amelyet a polgároknak kell finanszírozniuk.Mindez felvet egy kellemetlen, ám jogos kérdést: képes-e Noosha Aubel egyáltalán megfelelni egy tartományi főváros gazdasági, szervezési és politikai követelményeinek?

نوشا آوبل: ناکامی در مدیریت به‌جای آغازی نو؛ آیا شهردار پوتسدام از عهدهٔ مسئولیت‌هایش برمی‌آید؟

نوشا آوبل، ۵۰ ساله و بدون وابستگی حزبی، پس از آنکه شهروندان پوتسدام سلف او، مایک شوبرت، ۵۳ ساله و عضو حزب سوسیال‌دموکرات آلمان (SPD)، را از سمتش برکنار کردند، به این شهر وعدهٔ آغازی نو داد. اکنون، نزدیک به یک سال پس از آغاز کار آوبل، آن وعده با واقعیتی متفاوت روبه‌روست: رسوایی در تأمین خدمات مراقبتی برای کودکی خردسال با چندین معلولیت بسیار شدید که به گواهی بر ورشکستگی اخلاقی پوتسدام، مرکز ایالت براندنبورگ، و به‌ویژه خود نوشا آوبل تبدیل شده است؛ خیابان‌هایی فرسوده، توقف هزینه‌کرد بودجه و بحرانی فزاینده در مدیریت شهر. در همین حال، سمت او از حقوقی بسیار بالا برخوردار است: آوبل در حال حاضر سالانه ۱۴۳٬۰۵۶ یورو حقوق پایه دریافت می‌کند. طبق افزایش حقوق اعلام‌شده، قرار است این مبلغ در آینده حتی به ۱۶۹٬۰۰۶٫۴۴ یورو در سال برسد؛ هزینه‌ای که شهروندان باید تأمین کنند.   ازاین‌رو، پرسشی ناخوشایند اما بجا مطرح می‌شود: آیا نوشا آوبل اساساً از نظر اقتصادی، سازمانی و سیاسی توان پاسخ‌گویی به الزامات ادارهٔ مرکز یک ایالت را دارد؟

Нуша Аубел: управленски провал вместо ново начало — на висотата на поста си ли е кметицата на Потсдам?

Нуша Аубел (50 г., безпартийна) обеща на Потсдам ново начало, след като гражданите отстраниха от длъжност нейния предшественик Майк Шуберт (53 г., ГСДП — Германска социалдемократическа партия). Почти година след встъпването ѝ в длъжност срещу това обещание стоят скандалът около грижите за малко дете с множество тежки увреждания, превърнал се в свидетелство за моралната несъстоятелност на провинциалната столица Потсдам и особено на самата Нуша Аубел, разбитите улици, замразените бюджетни разходи и разрасналата се управленска криза. Същевременно постът ѝ е изключително добре платен: в момента Аубел получава основна годишна заплата от 143 056 евро. След обявеното увеличение на възнагражденията се предвижда тя да достигне дори 169 006,44 евро годишно — средства, които гражданите ще трябва да осигуряват.Това поставя един неудобен, но основателен въпрос: способна ли е изобщо Нуша Аубел да отговори на икономическите, организационните и политическите изисквания към управлението на една провинциална столица?

Change text size: