Deutsche Tageszeitung - UK PM says Mandelson 'lied', regrets appointing him US envoy

UK PM says Mandelson 'lied', regrets appointing him US envoy


UK PM says Mandelson 'lied', regrets appointing him US envoy
UK PM says Mandelson 'lied', regrets appointing him US envoy / Photo: © AFP

Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Wednesday said he regretted appointing Peter Mandelson as US ambassador, as the UK leader faced a storm of criticism after fresh revelations about the disgraced politician's close ties to Jeffrey Epstein.

Change text size:

"He's betrayed our country, he's lied repeatedly, he's responsible for a litany of deceit, but this moment demands not just anger, but action," Starmer told parliament.

Starmer said he did know about Mandelson's ongoing ties to Epstein but accused the former minister and EU trade commissioner "time and time again" of failing to reveal the extent of their relationship during the vetting for the Washington role last year.

The prime minister's judgement is under growing scrutiny following new allegations that his former top envoy in the United States had passed confidential information to the late US sex offender Epstein nearly two decades ago.

UK police have announced they are now probing the claims, which emerged from email exchanges between the pair that revealed the extent of their warm relations, financial dealings as well as private photos.

Around that time, Epstein was serving an 18-month jail term for soliciting a minor in Florida while Mandelson was a UK government minister under then-leader Gordon Brown.

"He lied repeatedly to my team when asked about his relationship with Epstein before and during his tenure as ambassador," Starmer told MPs during a parliamentary grilling.

"I regret appointing him. If I knew then what I know now, he would never have been anywhere near government."

- 'It was on Google' -

For decades a pivotal and often divisive figure in British politics, Mandelson has had a chequered career and has twice resigned from government for alleged misconduct.

Starmer sacked him as ambassador in September after only seven months in post following an earlier Epstein files release.

On Tuesday, Mandelson resigned from the upper house of parliament -- the unelected House of Lords -- after the latest release of Epstein files sparked renewed furore.

The main Conservative opposition will use its parliamentary time Wednesday to try to force the release of papers on his appointment in Washington.

Tory leader Kemi Badenoch insisted Starmer did know about Mandelson's ongoing Epstein ties. "He did know, it was on Google," she said.

"I asked him at that despatch box, he gave Mandelson his full confidence at that despatch box, not once, but twice. He only sacked him after pressure from us."

They want MPs to order the publication of all documents related to Mandelson getting the job in February last year.

Starmer vowed Wednesday to disclose the documents, barring any elements that might harm national security and international relations.

"I want to make sure this House sees the full documentation so it will see for itself the extent to which time and time again Mandelson completely misrepresented the extent of his relationship with Epstein."

Starmer also noted his team were drafting legislation "to strip Mandelson of his title" while head of state King Charles III was set to remove him from the list of privy counsellors able to advise the monarch.

- Criminal probe -

London's Metropolitan Police confirmed on Tuesday it had launched an investigation into 72-year-old Mandelson for misconduct in public office offences following the latest revelations.

If any charges were brought and he was convicted, he could potentially face imprisonment.

The scandal resurfaced after the release by the US Justice Department of the latest batch of documents. They showed Mandelson had forwarded in 2009 an economic briefing to Epstein intended for Brown.

In another 2010 email the US financier, who died by suicide in prison in 2019, asked Mandelson about the European Union's bailout of Greece.

The latest release also showed Epstein appeared to have transferred a total of $75,000 in three payments to accounts linked to the British politician between 2003 and 2004.

Mandelson has told the BBC he had no memory of the money transfers and did not know whether the documents were authentic.

The EU is also investigating whether Mandelson breached any of their rules during his time from 2004-2008 as trade commissioner.

(O.Tatarinov--DTZ)

Featured

Ireland and Ukraine consider drone cooperation memorandum after Dublin talks

Ireland and Ukraine exploring joint memorandum on drones following bilateral Ireland and Ukraine are exploring forming a joint memorandum on drones, the Taoiseach said following a bilateral meeting with the Ukrainian President.

Justice Minister Nominee Lee Yong-chul’s Past Defense of ‘Yangpyeong Log Cabin’ Murderer Revealed

Lee Yong-chul, the nominee for South Korea’s Minister of Justice, previously represented a murderer in the high-profile ‘Yangpyeong log-cabin family murder case’ during its Supreme Court appeal. While his representatives claim he did not substantively participate in the defense, records show he argued that prosecutors used coercive tactics to extract confessions from the convicted killer.

Government Overspends €607 Million on International Protection Accommodation in 2024

The Irish government recorded a €607 million overspend on international protection accommodation in 2024, according to a new report by the Public Accounts Committee (PAC). Total expenditure on international protection and Ukraine accommodation reached €2.3 billion, driven by record applicant numbers and reliance on commercial providers.

Three Arizona Judges Face Rare Defeat in Retention Elections

Three Arizona judges appointed by former Gov. Doug Ducey are facing rare defeats in their retention elections, with unofficial results showing all three trailing voters despite receiving favorable evaluations from the state’s judicial performance commission. The outcomes have sparked debate among legal experts regarding the future of judicial impartiality and the influence of partisan politics on the bench.

Change text size: