Deutsche Tageszeitung - US Congress to debate Trump's war powers

US Congress to debate Trump's war powers


US Congress to debate Trump's war powers
US Congress to debate Trump's war powers / Photo: © AFP

The US Congress is scheduled to vote this week on motions seeking to curb President Donald Trump as he wages war against Iran but the Republican majority will probably shield him.

Change text size:

Trump has sought to expand executive power dramatically since returning to the White House in 2025, overshadowing the legislature. So some lawmakers now want to reassert the role of Congress, which under the US constitution is the only body that can declare war.

"Trump has launched an unnecessary, idiotic, and illegal war against Iran," Senator Tim Kaine wrote on X shortly after the United States and Israel began it overnight Friday into Saturday.

In late January, as a huge US military buildup in the Middle East rumbled on, Kaine introduced a bill designed to force Trump to obtain authorization from Congress to engage in any military conflict with Iran. On Saturday he urged Congress to return immediately from recess to vote on his resolution.

In an opinion piece published Sunday in The Wall Street Journal, Kaine said that as a member of key legislative committees with access to classified information, "I can state plainly that there was no imminent threat from Iran to America sufficient to warrant committing our sons and daughters to another war in the Middle East."

- Is the war legal? -

This issue of whether there was an imminent threat from Iran is at the heart of the debate over the war that Trump has now begun with Israel.

Although only Congress can declare war, a law dating back to 1973 allows the president to launch a limited military intervention in response to an emergency situation created by an attack on the United States.

At a news conference Monday, Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth used the word "war" to describe the conflict with Iran, not just a limited military intervention.

In a video broadcast in the middle of the night from Friday into Saturday to announce the start of major combat operations, Trump asserted that Iran posed an "imminent" threat to the United States.

Daniel Shapiro, an analyst with the Atlantic Council, a think tank in Washington, said Trump failed to explain "the urgency or the imminent threat that required a war now."

"Typically, before launching such major operations, presidents and their senior advisers have explained to the American people the reason major military operations are required, and the strategic objective they are intended to achieve," Shapiro wrote.

"They also customarily brief Congress, so the people’s representatives can express their view," Shapiro wrote.

But Trump did not do any of this, he said, except for a briefing with eight congressional leaders a few days before the bombs started falling on Iran.

- Sixty days -

The White House said Sunday that right before the attack started it gave these same eight leaders formal notice of hostilities.

The 1973 War Powers Act states that Trump must now obtain permission from Congress if he wants to keep fighting beyond a 60-day time limit.

Republican congressman Thomas Massie, one of few in Trump's camp that speaks out regularly to challenge him, condemned the Iran war on Saturday.

This conservative lawmaker said he would present a bill in the House of Representatives along with Democratic colleague Ro Khanna to force a vote by Congress on the war with Iran.

"The Constitution requires a vote, and your Representative needs to be on record as opposing or supporting this war," Massie wrote on X.

A vote in the Senate on Kaine's bill is expected this week, as is a possible vote in the House on the other bill to curb Trump.

But most Republicans, who are against tying Trump's hands, are expected to vote against these bills.

And even if they pass, they would probably not survive a veto by Trump because overriding him requires a two-thirds majority in both chambers.

(M.Dorokhin--DTZ)

Featured

Justice Minister Nominee Lee Yong-chul’s Past Defense of ‘Yangpyeong Log Cabin’ Murderer Revealed

Lee Yong-chul, the nominee for South Korea’s Minister of Justice, previously represented a murderer in the high-profile ‘Yangpyeong log-cabin family murder case’ during its Supreme Court appeal. While his representatives claim he did not substantively participate in the defense, records show he argued that prosecutors used coercive tactics to extract confessions from the convicted killer.

Government Overspends €607 Million on International Protection Accommodation in 2024

The Irish government recorded a €607 million overspend on international protection accommodation in 2024, according to a new report by the Public Accounts Committee (PAC). Total expenditure on international protection and Ukraine accommodation reached €2.3 billion, driven by record applicant numbers and reliance on commercial providers.

Three Arizona Judges Face Rare Defeat in Retention Elections

Three Arizona judges appointed by former Gov. Doug Ducey are facing rare defeats in their retention elections, with unofficial results showing all three trailing voters despite receiving favorable evaluations from the state’s judicial performance commission. The outcomes have sparked debate among legal experts regarding the future of judicial impartiality and the influence of partisan politics on the bench.

Florida AG Investigates DSA Politicians Over Suspected Chinese and Cuban Funding

Florida Attorney-General James Uthmeier has initiated a formal investigation into the financial activities of Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) politicians, focusing on allegations of foreign funding. The probe examines whether tens of thousands of dollars provided by China and Cuba were used to finance official travel for DSA delegates in 2025.

Change text size: