Deutsche Tageszeitung - US govt says Anthropic AI an 'unacceptable risk' to military

US govt says Anthropic AI an 'unacceptable risk' to military


US govt says Anthropic AI an 'unacceptable risk' to military
US govt says Anthropic AI an 'unacceptable risk' to military / Photo: © AFP

Artificial intelligence company Anthropic posed an "unacceptable risk" to military supply chains, the US government insisted Tuesday, as it defends against the tech firm's challenge to a designation as dangerous.

Change text size:

Anthropic's Claude AI model has been in the spotlight in recent weeks both for its alleged use in identifying targets for US bombing in Iran and the company's refusal that its systems be used to power mass surveillance in the United States or lethal fully autonomous weapons systems.

Justifying its decision to cut ties with Anthropic in response to a legal complaint from the firm, the Pentagon -- dubbed the Department of War (DoW) by the Trump administration -- said it "became concerned that allowing Anthropic continued access to DoW’s technical and operational warfighting infrastructure would introduce unacceptable risk into DoW supply chains," in a court document seen by AFP.

"AI systems are acutely vulnerable to manipulation," the government added in the filing to a California federal court.

"Anthropic could attempt to disable its technology or preemptively alter the behavior of its model either before or during ongoing warfighting operations, if Anthropic -- in its discretion -- feels that its corporate 'red lines' are being crossed," it said.

Anthropic's refusal to agree that its AI tech could be deployed by the military for "any lawful use" therefore posed an "unacceptable risk to national security," the document read.

"Anthropic’s behavior more generally caused the Department to question whether Anthropic represented a trusted partner," the government said.

Classification as a "supply chain risk," which Anthropic has challenged in a case against the Pentagon and other arms of the federal government, in theory means that all government suppliers would be barred from doing business with the company.

The designation is typically reserved for organizations from foreign adversary countries, such as Chinese tech giant Huawei.

Other major American tech firms such as Microsoft, which itself both uses Anthropic's Claude model and supplies the US military, have weighed in on the AI company's side.

"This is not the time to put at risk the very AI ecosystem that the administration has helped to champion," Microsoft said in an amicus brief filed with the court last week.

(O.Zhukova--DTZ)

Featured

Florida AG Investigates DSA Politicians Over Suspected Chinese and Cuban Funding

Florida Attorney-General James Uthmeier has initiated a formal investigation into the financial activities of Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) politicians, focusing on allegations of foreign funding. The probe examines whether tens of thousands of dollars provided by China and Cuba were used to finance official travel for DSA delegates in 2025.

Qatar Leads Diplomatic Push to Bridge US-Iran Divide Amid Regional Tensions

Qatar is advancing a comprehensive diplomatic campaign aimed at reducing tensions between the United States and Iran and promoting regional stability. Following high-level meetings in Washington with US leadership, Qatari officials reported sustained consultations with international partners to prevent escalation and support peace efforts across the Middle East and beyond.

Eli Crane Defeats Jonathan Nez in Tight Arizona Congressional Race

Incumbent Republican U.S. Representative Eli Crane has retained his seat in Arizona’s second congressional district after defeating former Navajo Nation President Jonathan Nez in an unexpectedly close election. The Associated Press called the race on Monday, confirming Crane’s narrow victory following nearly a week of vote counting.

Economist Testifies Canada Has Limited Power to Alter Global Climate

An environmental economist testifying at Canada’s first youth-led climate trial stated Monday that the federal government has limited power to alter the climate within its borders because global warming is largely driven by the choices of other nations. Professor David Anthoff, appearing as the first witness for the federal government in Vancouver, emphasized that while domestic policy matters, it cannot solve the problem in isolation.

Change text size: