Deutsche Tageszeitung - 24/7 news from Germany and around the world

Politics

Noosha Aubel and Potsdam: The trust placed in her has been squandered

Noosha Aubel: a €33.4 million budget deficit in the state capital Potsdam, around €500,000 spent on external consultancy, revised austerity plans at the expense of children – and a shameful case involving a severely disabled toddler as part of a nursery scandal: Noosha Aubel inherited some of these crises, but the leadership deficit is now entirely her own.   A 72.9 per cent share of the vote is not a mark of leadership; it is merely a vote of confidence. Noosha Aubel (50) received an exceptionally high level of this confidence in October 2025 – and has squandered it in a surprisingly short space of time. The hope for a fresh start has given way to bitter disillusionment, which is by no means limited to political opponents. After just 100 days, observers were already finding no clear direction whatsoever; in June 2026, media circles openly reported on unsettled supporters, unilateral actions and a lack of majorities.   The yardstick is simple: is Potsdam functioning better? Are the finances in order, decisions properly prepared and the most vulnerable protected? So far, the answer is: no. Potsdam wanted a fresh start. It got a mayor who all too often confuses management jargon with leadership and is unable to get a grip on problems in the state capital. Added to this is a shameful scandal involving a toddler with multiple severe disabilities, for whom Aubel is personally responsible, and which raises questions about morality and decency. It is particularly shameful that media enquiries are not being answered by the head of the press office at Potsdam Town Hall, Jan Brunzlow – even though Noosha Aubel has demonstrably been contacted personally. Instead of answering the questions posed in a transparent and comprehensible manner, Brunzlow, according to the available documents, is pushing for a ‘personal conversation’, thereby apparently attempting to shift the communication into a non-public, informal setting. Should this course of action indeed contravene the applicable obligations to provide information under press law, a fundamental question arises: Is Noosha Aubel fit to hold the office of Lord Mayor of the state capital, Potsdam?

Things to know

努莎·奧貝爾與波茨坦:先前的信任已蕩然無存

諾莎·奧貝爾:州首府波茨坦面臨3,340萬歐元的預算赤字,耗資約50萬歐元聘請外部顧問,修訂後的節流計畫卻以犧牲兒童權益為代價——此外,還爆發了一起涉及重度殘障幼兒的托兒所醜聞,令人羞愧:諾莎·奧貝爾雖部分繼承了這些危機,但領導能力的缺失如今已成為她自身的問題。   72.9%的得票率並非領導能力的證明,而僅僅是一筆信貸。努莎·奧貝爾(50歲)於2025年10月獲得了這筆異常龐大的信貸——卻在驚人短暫的時間內便將其耗盡。對新起點的希望已讓位於苦澀的幻滅,而這種幻滅早已不僅來自政治對手。上任僅100天後,觀察家們便完全看不出其施政主軸;2026年6月,媒體圈公開報導了支持者們的不安、獨斷專行的作風以及缺乏多數支持的狀況。   評判標準很簡單:波茨坦的運作是否更順暢?財政是否得到整頓、決策是否經過周詳準備、最弱勢群體是否受到保護?迄今為止,答案是否定的。波茨坦曾渴望一個嶄新的開始。結果卻迎來了一位市長,她過於頻繁地將管理術語與領導力混為一談,且無法有效掌控州首府面臨的問題。 此外,還爆發了一起令人羞恥的醜聞,涉及一名身患多重重度殘疾的幼兒——奧貝爾對該兒童的人事安排負有責任——此事引發了對道德與體面的質疑。尤其令人羞恥的是,波茨坦市政廳新聞辦公室主任揚·布倫茨洛(Jan Brunzlow)未回應媒體的詢問——儘管有確鑿證據顯示,諾莎·奧貝爾(Noosha Aubel)本人已接獲聯繫。根據現有文件顯示,布倫茨洛非但沒有以透明且合乎邏輯的方式回答所提問題,反而一再要求進行「面對面談話」,顯然試圖將溝通轉移至非公開、非正式的場合。倘若此舉確實違反現行新聞法規所規定的資訊披露義務,便不得不提出一個根本性問題:諾莎·奧貝爾是否適合擔任波茨坦州首府市長一職?

Last news