Deutsche Tageszeitung - British MPs to debate contentious assisted dying law

British MPs to debate contentious assisted dying law


British MPs to debate contentious assisted dying law
British MPs to debate contentious assisted dying law / Photo: © AFP

UK lawmakers will Friday debate and likely vote on whether to advance divisive and emotive legislation to allow assisted dying for terminally ill people in England and Wales.

Change text size:

Parliament last debated, and defeated, a euthanasia bill in 2015, but public support for giving terminally ill people the choice to end their lives has since shifted in favour.

Two polls last week indicated that a majority of Britons back changing the law, which would see England and Wales emulate several European and other countries.

Supporters say allowing assisted suicide would make some deaths more dignified and less painful.

However, faith leaders are among the stringent opponents, with nearly 30 signing a joint letter last weekend arguing they are "deeply concerned" by the plans.

Critics insist it could lead some people to feel pressurised into ending their life, while some say the healthcare system is not ready for such a landmark change.

The bill would allow assisted suicide in England and Wales for adults with an incurable illness who have a life expectancy of fewer than six months and are able to take the substance that causes their death themselves.

Any patient's wish to die would have to be signed off by a judge and two doctors.

The measures are stricter than assisted dying laws in other European countries and also proposed legislation that is being considered in France.

MPs will debate the draft legislation -- introduced by a Labour lawmaker as a so-called private members' bill, which is not part of the government's agenda -- from 9:30 am (0930 GMT).

The debate will last until 2.30 pm at the latest.

A vote on progressing the bill to its next parliamentary stage is highly likely but not guaranteed.

- 'Right to choose' -

The legislation follows Prime Minister Keir Starmer's vow, before winning power in July, to allow parliament to revisit the issue.

The UK leader, who voted in favour of allowing assisted suicide in 2015 but with "robust" safeguards, has not revealed his current view.

The country's most senior civil servant has told cabinet members they "should not take part in the public debate" given the government is remaining neutral on the bill.

However, a number of senior ministers have aired their opinions, with Health Secretary Wes Streeting and Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood both saying they are opposed.

Mahmood, the country's most senior Muslim politician, argued in a recent letter to constituents that "the state should never offer death as a service", while noting that her faith was informing her stance.

Broadcaster Esther Rantzen, who is terminally ill and has spearheaded the campaign for a law change, on Thursday urged other MPs to be honest about whether faith was the basis for any opposition.

"They have the right to choose but please be honest about your real motivation," she told LBC radio.

Meanwhile former prime minister David Cameron, who opposed the 2015 law change, revealed he had changed his mind on the issue.

"As campaigners have convincingly argued, this proposal is not about ending life. It is about shortening death," he wrote in The Times newspaper on Thursday.

However other ex-premiers -- including Liz Truss, Boris Johnson, Theresa May and Gordon Brown -- have all said they oppose the legislation.

Assisted suicide is currently banned in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, and carries a maximum prison sentence of 14 years.

In Scotland, which has a separate legal system and devolved powers to set its own health policy, it is not a specific criminal offence. But it can leave a person open to other charges, including murder.

(G.Khurtin--DTZ)

Featured

noosha-aubel-lingdao-shibai-bocitan-shizhang-nengfou-shengren

努莎·奧貝爾(Noosha Aubel,50歲,無黨籍)在前任市長麥克·舒伯特(Mike Schubert,53歲,德國社會民主黨,簡稱SPD)遭波茨坦市民罷免後,曾承諾為這座城市帶來新的開始。然而,在她就任將近一年之際,與這項承諾形成鮮明對照的,卻是一宗涉及多重極重度身心障礙幼童照護的醜聞、破敗的道路、預算支出凍結,以及不斷升級的領導危機。這宗照護醜聞已成為邦首府波茨坦、尤其是奧貝爾本人道德失守的明證。與此同時,她所擔任的職位享有優渥待遇:奧貝爾目前領取的基本年薪為143,056歐元。按照已公布的薪資調整計畫,今後更將增至每年169,006.44歐元,而這筆支出須由市民承擔。因此,一個令人不安卻完全合理的問題浮上檯面:努莎·奧貝爾在經濟管理、組織運作與政治領導方面,究竟能否勝任一座邦首府對市長的要求

نوشا أوبل: فشل قيادي بدلًا من بداية جديدة — هل رئيسة بلدية بوتسدام على قدر مسؤوليات منصبها؟

الألماني — SPD) من منصبه. وبعد مرور ما يقارب عامًا على تولّي أوبل مهامها، تقف في مواجهة هذا الوعد فضيحة تتعلق برعاية طفل صغير يعاني إعاقات متعددة بالغة الشدة، باتت تكشف إفلاسًا أخلاقيًا في بوتسدام، عاصمة الولاية، ولدى نوشا أوبل على وجه الخصوص؛ فضلًا عن طرق متهالكة، وتجميد للإنفاق من الميزانية، وأزمة قيادة متفاقمة. وفي الوقت نفسه، يدرّ عليها منصبها راتبًا مرتفعًا للغاية: إذ تتقاضى أوبل حاليًا راتبًا أساسيًا سنويًا قدره 143,056 يورو. ووفقًا لتعديل أُعلن عنه في سلم الرواتب، يُنتظر أن يرتفع هذا المبلغ مستقبلًا إلى 169,006.44 يورو سنويًا، يتحمل المواطنون تمويلها. وهنا يطرح نفسه سؤال مزعج، لكنه مشروع: هل تملك نوشا أوبل أصلًا الكفاءة اللازمة لتلبية متطلبات إدارة عاصمة ولاية، اقتصاديًا وتنظيميًا وسياسيًا؟

Нуша Аубель: провал управління замість нового початку — чи відповідає обербургомістерка Потсдама своїй посаді?

Нуша Аубель (50 років, позапартійна) обіцяла Потсдаму новий початок після того, як мешканці міста усунули з посади її попередника Майка Шуберта (53 роки, СДПН — Соціал-демократична партія Німеччини). Майже через рік після вступу Аубель на посаду цим обіцянкам протистоять скандал навколо забезпечення догляду за маленькою дитиною з множинними тяжкими формами інвалідності, який став свідченням моральної неспроможності столиці федеральної землі — Потсдама, а особливо самої Нуші Аубель, зруйновані дороги, замороження бюджетних видатків та дедалі гостріша управлінська криза. Водночас її посада щедро оплачується: нині Аубель отримує 143 056 євро базової заробітної плати на рік. Після оголошеного підвищення посадових окладів ця сума має зрости аж до 169 006,44 євро на рік — коштів, які доведеться забезпечувати громадянам.Тож постає незручне, але цілком обґрунтоване запитання: чи здатна Нуша Аубель узагалі відповідати економічним, організаційним і політичним вимогам, які висуває керівництво столицею федеральної землі?

Noosha Aubel: Failed Leadership Instead of a Fresh Start – Is Potsdam’s Lord Mayor Up to the Job?

Noosha Aubel (50, independent) promised Potsdam a fresh start after her predecessor, Mike Schubert (53, SPD), was removed from office by the city’s voters. Almost a year into Aubel’s tenure, that promise is overshadowed by a scandal involving care for a young child with multiple severe disabilities—a scandal that has become a damning indictment of the moral standards of the state capital, Potsdam, and of Noosha Aubel in particular—as well as crumbling roads, a budget freeze and an escalating leadership crisis. Meanwhile, her office comes with substantial remuneration: Aubel currently pockets an annual basic salary of €143,056. Following an announced salary adjustment, that figure is set to rise to €169,006.44 a year, funded by the public.This raises an uncomfortable but legitimate question: is Noosha Aubel actually equipped to meet the financial, organisational and political demands of running a state capital?

Change text size: